DefiLlama data shows that the market value of on-chain tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) has reached $34.6 billion, revealing a wide gap between issued token supplies and their real-world utility. Of this total supply, only $3.79 billion, or roughly 11%, is actively circulating within DeFi protocols. The remaining 89% sits idle.
This usage disparity is evident among top-tier institutional products. BlackRock’s BUIDL token records a utilization rate of just 0.64% in DeFi. Franklin Templeton’s BENJI sits at 0%, followed by Circle’s USYC token at 0.52%.
Different Designs, Different Utility
The situation reverses sharply for assets designed specifically as collateral. Products in this category show utilization levels approaching full capacity. Centrifuge’s JAAA leads with a 97.97% utilization rate, closely followed by Re Protocol’s reUSD at 97.87%, and Maple Finance’s SyrupUSDT at 88.84%.
Artem Tolkachev, Chief RWA Officer at Falcon Finance, believes low DeFi utility is not an automatic indicator of a weak product. Tolkachev noted that money market funds held by investors to earn yield and redeemed on schedule are already fulfilling their purpose, even if their DeFi utilization stands at zero. He added that issues only arise if a product was deliberately built for lending yet fails to attract demand after launch.
Obstacles in Pricing Mechanisms
The root cause of the slow adoption of traditional assets in DeFi lies in data infrastructure. A RedStone report highlights that lending protocols struggle to accept RWAs because conventional instruments lack continuous price feeds. US Treasuries, money market funds, and corporate credit do not have 24/7 price charts like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
Falcon Finance implements a multi-layered screening framework before approving an RWA as collateral. They enforce a five-stage evaluation, ranging from verifying the legal claims of token holders, analyzing redemption terms, and assessing secondary market liquidity depth. They also test price feed resilience against manipulation, as well as the credit quality of the issuing entity.
Risk gaps are addressed through borrowing limit reductions. Falcon applies larger haircut rates when an asset has thin liquidity or is tied to conventional markets with prolonged closing hours. Ultimately, placing traditional assets onto the blockchain does not change their underlying nature; liquidity providers remain bound by native market rules and the inherent design constraints of the token itself.
Dilansir dari crypto.news.
Read also: What Is DeFi (Decentralized Finance)?
Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only, not financial advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile and carry significant risk. Always do your own research (DYOR) and never invest more than you can afford to lose.
